Fair Patent Laws
Floating Share Widget
Retailers and other businesses are seeing an increasing number of patent lawsuits, and about 40 percent of the cases come from a relatively new breed of litigants known as “patent trolls.” The “trolls” are firms whose business model focuses on buying obscure patents for things they didn’t invent, then threatening to sue companies that use the technology involved unless they pay a licensing fee. The threats often involve technology or practices users don’t realize are patented, and that aren’t clearly linked to the patent in question. Patent trolls lose more than 90 percent of the cases that make it to trial. But the cost of defending companies against the claims is so high — the average case costs $2 million and can take 18 months — that many victims settle out of court and the cases cost legitimate businesses close to $30 billion a year.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Robert Goodlatte, R-Va., has reintroduced the Innovation Act, legislation intended to curb patent trolls’ abusive practices and protect retailers and other end users of technology from frivolous patent infringement lawsuits. The bill passed the House in 2013 but efforts stalled in the Senate in 2014 when former Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he would not let a measure move because of objections from trial lawyers. Senate passage is expected to be easier now that Republicans control both chambers of Congress following the 2014 elections, with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, saying patent reform is “probably one of these things we can get done early.” Retailers need to contact members of Congress and tell them patent reform legislation must include key provisions needed to protect retailers from patent troll abuses and frivolous lawsuits.
Why it Matters to Retailers
Retailers are among patent trolls’ most frequent targets thanks to the industry’s increasing use of cutting-edge innovations, especially in online and mobile retailing. In one example, more than 40 online retailers whose smartphone apps include a link to privacy policies posted on their web sites have been sued or threatened by a California company claiming to hold a patent on the practice. In another, companies that scan a paper document into a computer and then attach it to an e-mail have been asked to pay a fee. Even adding an item to an online shopping cart and checking out has been challenged as patent infringement. Whether retailers go to trial or settle out of court, the cases consume time and money that could be better spent creating jobs, growing the economy, and serving customers.
NRF Advocates for Fair Patent Laws
NRF welcomed the re-introduced Goodlatte bill as “an important step toward disrupting the operations of patent trolls.” The legislation would require that “demand” letters threatening to sue be more specific so recipients could better understand the infringement being alleged. Court papers would also have to be more specific, judges would decide early on whether a patent is valid, losing patent trolls would have to pay court costs, rules would be changed to reduce discovery costs, and lawsuits against end users who simply bought a product off the shelf could be postponed while claims against the manufacturer are resolved.
NRF has formed a new coalition intended to ensure that legislation is not blocked again. The United for Patent Reform group is chaired by NRF and computer technology giant Oracle, and includes retail, restaurant, grocery, hotel and technology companies and associations among its members. The coalition will build upon the work done by NRF’s Patent Troll Working Group, and NRF is continuing to work closely with members of the House and Senate.
- Policy Agenda
- Action Center
- Retail's Impact
- Policy Committees
- Voting Records
- State Retail Associations
- Vote Retail
- State of the Union